What is the main difference between Chroma and Supermemory?

Chroma and Supermemory are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Chroma or Supermemory?

The choice between Chroma and Supermemory depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Chroma to Supermemory?

Migration between Chroma and Supermemory is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Chroma vs Supermemory

Learn how Chroma and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Chroma

Open-source vector database designed for AI applications. Store, search, and retrieve embeddings with semantic similarity matching and metadata filtering.

Visit Chroma Read more

29,142stars+256(+0.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
1.5.9
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
chroma-core/chroma

Supermemory

Add persistent memory to LLM apps with millisecond recall times. Store, retrieve, and personalize user data across sessions with enterprise-grade security.

Visit Supermemory Read more

29,057stars+432(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.0.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
supermemoryai/supermemory

Detailed Comparison

Both Chroma and Supermemory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both Chroma and Supermemory show comparable community engagement with 29,142 and 29,057 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Supermemory has 2,527 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Supermemory wins

Growth Momentum

Supermemory is growing faster, adding 432 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 256 stars for Chroma (+0.9%). Supermemory is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Chroma last updated 1 day ago and Supermemory 14 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Chroma uses Bash, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust.

Chroma wins

Project Maturity

Chroma has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Supermemory which began 2 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Chroma may have more mature features and established processes.

Supermemory wins

Licensing

Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Chroma's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable