What is the main difference between Laminar and Supermemory?

Laminar and Supermemory are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Laminar or Supermemory?

The choice between Laminar and Supermemory depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Laminar to Supermemory?

Migration between Laminar and Supermemory is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Laminar vs Supermemory

Learn how Laminar and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Laminar

Laminar is an open-source platform that helps collect, understand, and utilize data for building high-quality LLM applications.

Visit Laminar Read more

3,196stars+78(+2.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
15 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.2.2
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
lmnr-ai/lmnr

Supermemory

Add persistent memory to LLM apps with millisecond recall times. Store, retrieve, and personalize user data across sessions with enterprise-grade security.

Visit Supermemory Read more

29,068stars+418(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v0.0.8
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
supermemoryai/supermemory

Detailed Comparison

Both Laminar and Supermemory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Supermemory wins

Community & Popularity

Supermemory significantly outpaces Laminar in community adoption with 29,068 stars compared to 3,196 stars on GitHub. This 9.1x difference suggests Supermemory has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Supermemory has 2,527 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Laminar wins

Growth Momentum

Laminar is growing faster, adding 78 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 418 stars for Supermemory (+1.5%). Laminar is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Laminar last updated 15 hours ago and Supermemory 8 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Laminar uses Python, Next.js, Rust.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Laminar beginning 2 years ago and Supermemory 2 years ago.

Supermemory wins

Licensing

Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Laminar's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable