Learn how Letta and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai memory & context tools is best for you.

Supermemory appears to have several advantages over Letta, particularly in licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Letta having 23,957 stars and Supermemory having 28,610 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Letta has 2,549 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Letta last updated 4 days ago and Supermemory 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Letta uses Bash, Python while Supermemory leverages JSX.
Both projects started around the same time, with Letta beginning 3 years ago and Supermemory 2 years ago.
Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Letta's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Memory & Context. However, they also have distinct specializations: Letta also focuses on AI Agent Platforms.
Supermemory provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Letta may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository