Learn how Langfuse and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

Both Langfuse and Supermemory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Langfuse having 31,856 stars and Supermemory having 28,613 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Langfuse has 3,387 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Langfuse last updated 10 hours ago and Supermemory 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Langfuse uses Bash, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Langfuse beginning 3 years ago and Supermemory 2 years ago.
Supermemory is licensed under MIT, while Langfuse's license terms are not publicly specified.
Langfuse also focuses on LLM Observability & Evaluation while Supermemory extends into AI Memory & Context.
Both Langfuse and Supermemory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository