What is the main difference between Agno and Supermemory?

Agno and Supermemory are both llm application frameworks but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Agno or Supermemory?

The choice between Agno and Supermemory depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Agno to Supermemory?

Migration between Agno and Supermemory is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Start using Open Source today

Learn more

Agno vs Supermemory

Learn how Agno and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm application frameworks is best for you.

Agno

Open-source platform that enables developers to create, deploy and monitor AI agents with built-in memory, knowledge integration, and external tool connectivity.

Visit Agno Read more

Stars
40,644
Forks
5,508
Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
License
Apache-2.0

Activity score

97/100

View Repository

Supermemory

Add persistent memory to LLM apps with millisecond recall times. Store, retrieve, and personalize user data across sessions with enterprise-grade security.

Visit Supermemory Read more

Stars
26,748
Forks
2,328
Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

95/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Agno and Supermemory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Agno wins

Community & Popularity

Agno leads in popularity with 40,644 stars vs 26,748 stars for Supermemory. The 52% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Agno has 5,508 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Agno last updated 10 hours ago and Supermemory 11 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Agno uses Bash, Python while Supermemory leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX.

Agno wins

Project Maturity

Agno has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Supermemory which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Agno may have more mature features and established processes.

Supermemory wins

Licensing

Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Agno's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Application Frameworks. However, they also have distinct specializations: Agno also focuses on AI Agent Platforms while Supermemory extends into Data Platforms for AI.

Supermemory wins

Hosting & Deployment

Supermemory provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Agno may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.