Learn how Agno and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Supermemory appears to have several advantages over Agno, particularly in growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Agno having 41,854 stars and Supermemory having 29,010 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Agno has 5,811 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Supermemory is growing faster, adding 420 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 445 stars for Agno (+1.1%). Supermemory is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Agno last updated 9 hours ago and Supermemory 11 hours ago.
Agno uses Bash, Python while Supermemory leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX.
Agno has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Supermemory which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Agno may have more mature features and established processes.
Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Agno's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Agno also focuses on AI Agent Platforms, LLM Application Frameworks while Supermemory extends into AI Memory & Context.
Supermemory provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Agno may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.