Learn how Agno and Supermemory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm application frameworks is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Agno and Supermemory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Agno leads in popularity with 39,669 stars vs 22,203 stars for Supermemory. The 79% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Agno has 5,297 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Agno last updated 2 hours ago and Supermemory 9 hours ago.
Agno uses Bash, Python while Supermemory leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX.
Agno has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Supermemory which began 2 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Agno may have more mature features and established processes.
Supermemory uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Agno's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Application Frameworks. However, they also have distinct specializations: Agno also focuses on AI Agent Platforms while Supermemory extends into Data Platforms for AI.
Supermemory provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Agno may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.