Learn how QuestDB and Timescale differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

QuestDB appears to have several advantages over Timescale, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with QuestDB having 17,122 stars and Timescale having 22,947 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, QuestDB has 1,608 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with QuestDB last updated 23 hours ago and Timescale 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: QuestDB uses JavaScript, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, C++, C# while Timescale leverages Perl.
QuestDB has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Timescale which began 9 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests QuestDB may have more mature features and established processes.
QuestDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Timescale's license terms are not publicly specified.
Timescale extends into Relational Databases (SQL), Time Series Databases.