InfluxDB vs QuestDB
Learn how InfluxDB and QuestDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Learn how InfluxDB and QuestDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
InfluxDB
Stars
31,445Forks
3,706Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
QuestDB
Stars
16,880Forks
1,565Last commit
2 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both InfluxDB and QuestDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and licensing when making your decision.
Both InfluxDB and QuestDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and licensing when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
InfluxDB leads in popularity with 31,445 stars vs 16,880 stars for QuestDB. The 86% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, InfluxDB has 3,706 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with InfluxDB last updated 9 hours ago and QuestDB 2 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: QuestDB leverages JavaScript, Golang, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, C#.
Project Maturity
Both projects started around the same time, with InfluxDB beginning 13 years ago and QuestDB 12 years ago.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.