Learn how InfluxDB and QuestDB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time series databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both InfluxDB and QuestDB have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
InfluxDB leads in popularity with 31,729 stars vs 17,313 stars for QuestDB. The 83% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, InfluxDB has 3,716 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
QuestDB is growing faster, adding 69 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against adding 42 stars for InfluxDB (+0.1%). QuestDB is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with InfluxDB last updated 10 hours ago and QuestDB 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: QuestDB leverages JavaScript, Golang, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, C#.
Both projects started around the same time, with InfluxDB beginning 13 years ago and QuestDB 12 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Series Databases.
InfluxDB provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while QuestDB may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.