Learn how QuestDB and TDengine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both QuestDB and TDengine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and licensing when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with QuestDB having 16,880 stars and TDengine having 24,835 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, TDengine has 5,005 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with QuestDB last updated 56 minutes ago and TDengine 21 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, C#. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TDengine leverages CSS, MATLAB, Lua, R, Ada.
QuestDB has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to TDengine which began 7 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests QuestDB may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: QuestDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TDengine uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.