What is the main difference between QuestDB and TDengine?

QuestDB and TDengine are both open source tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: QuestDB or TDengine?

The choice between QuestDB and TDengine depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from QuestDB to TDengine?

Migration between QuestDB and TDengine is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Learn more

QuestDB vs TDengine

Learn how QuestDB and TDengine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

QuestDB

Open-source time-series database offering massive ingestion throughput, millisecond queries, and SQL extensions, designed for optimal performance at any hardware scale.

Visit QuestDB Read more

Stars
17,015
Forks
1,593
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
12 years
License
Apache-2.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 3 hours ago.

TDengine

Purpose-built database for Industry 4.0 and IoT that enables real-time ingestion, storage, and analysis of massive sensor data with high compression

Visit TDengine Read more

Stars
24,883
Forks
4,995
Last commit
18 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
License
AGPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 3 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Both QuestDB and TDengine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and licensing when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with QuestDB having 17,015 stars and TDengine having 24,883 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, TDengine has 4,995 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with QuestDB last updated 3 hours ago and TDengine 18 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, C#. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TDengine leverages CSS, MATLAB, Lua, R, Ada.

QuestDB wins

Project Maturity

QuestDB has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to TDengine which began 7 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests QuestDB may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: QuestDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TDengine uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Other tool comparisons to consider