Learn how QuestDB and TDengine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both QuestDB and TDengine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and licensing when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with QuestDB having 17,122 stars and TDengine having 24,920 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, TDengine has 5,001 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with QuestDB last updated 22 hours ago and TDengine 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, PHP, Java, C++, C#. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TDengine leverages CSS, MATLAB, Lua, R, Ada.
QuestDB has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to TDengine which began 7 years ago. This 5.3-year head start suggests QuestDB may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: QuestDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 while TDengine uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.