Learn how TDengine and TimescaleDb differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time series databases is best for you.

Both TDengine and TimescaleDb have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both TDengine and TimescaleDb show comparable community engagement with 25,011 and 23,207 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, TDengine has 5,012 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with TDengine last updated 1 day ago and TimescaleDb 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TDengine uses JavaScript, CSS, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, C++, MATLAB, C#, Lua, R, Ada while TimescaleDb leverages Perl.
TimescaleDb has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to TDengine which began 7 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests TimescaleDb may have more mature features and established processes.
TDengine is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while TimescaleDb's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Series Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: TimescaleDb extends into Relational Databases (SQL).

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository