Learn how TDengine and TimescaleDb differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time series databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both TDengine and TimescaleDb have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both TDengine and TimescaleDb show comparable community engagement with 25,068 and 23,382 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, TDengine has 5,017 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
TimescaleDb is growing faster, adding 233 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 100 stars for TDengine (+0.4%). TimescaleDb is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with TDengine last updated 5 days ago and TimescaleDb 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: TDengine uses JavaScript, CSS, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, C++, MATLAB, C#, Lua, R, Ada while TimescaleDb leverages Perl.
TimescaleDb has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to TDengine which began 7 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests TimescaleDb may have more mature features and established processes.
TDengine is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while TimescaleDb's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Series Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: TimescaleDb extends into Relational Databases (SQL).