Learn how Postal and Sendportal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.

Postal appears to have several advantages over Sendportal, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Postal significantly outpaces Sendportal in community adoption with 16,724 stars compared to 2,154 stars on GitHub. This 7.8x difference suggests Postal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Postal has 1,270 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Postal and Sendportal are moving at much the same rate, adding 58 stars and adding 7 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Postal shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 days ago, while Sendportal was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Postal is being more actively maintained.
Postal uses JavaScript, Bash, SCSS, Ruby, CoffeeScript while Sendportal leverages PHP, Laravel.
Postal has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Sendportal which began 6 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Postal may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters, Email Platforms.
Both Postal and Sendportal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository