Learn how Listmonk and Postal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email marketing & newsletter tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Postal appears to have several advantages over Listmonk, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Listmonk having 19,551 stars and Postal having 16,451 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Listmonk has 1,998 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Listmonk last updated 10 hours ago and Postal 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Listmonk uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang, Vue while Postal leverages Ruby, CoffeeScript.
Postal has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Listmonk which began 7 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Postal may have more mature features and established processes.
Postal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Listmonk's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Marketing & Newsletters. However, they also have distinct specializations: Listmonk also focuses on Marketing Automation while Postal extends into Email Platforms.
Both Listmonk and Postal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.