Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how OpenCode and PearAI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding assistants is best for you.
OpenCode appears to have several advantages over PearAI, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces PearAI in community adoption with 192,807 stars compared to 762 stars on GitHub. This 253.0x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 24,629 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode shows more recent development activity with its last commit 7 hours ago, while PearAI was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests OpenCode is being more actively maintained.
OpenCode uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri while PearAI leverages Bash.
Both projects started around the same time, with OpenCode beginning 1 year ago and PearAI 2 years ago.
OpenCode is licensed under MIT, while PearAI's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenCode also focuses on AI Coding Agents while PearAI extends into AI-Powered Editors.
PearAI provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenCode may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
OpenCodevs
ClineActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository
