Learn how LosslessCut and OpenShot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.70.1License
GPL-2.0Repository
mifi/lossless-cut
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v4.0.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
openshot/openshot-qt
Both LosslessCut and OpenShot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LosslessCut significantly outpaces OpenShot in community adoption with 45,097 stars compared to 6,683 stars on GitHub. This 6.7x difference suggests LosslessCut has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LosslessCut has 2,267 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LosslessCut is growing faster, adding 1,103 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 145 stars for OpenShot (+2.2%). LosslessCut is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LosslessCut last updated 13 hours ago and OpenShot 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LosslessCut uses Typescript, JSX, SCSS while OpenShot leverages Python.
OpenShot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to LosslessCut which began 10 years ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests OpenShot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 while OpenShot uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors. However, they also have distinct specializations: LosslessCut also focuses on Audio Editors.