Kdenlive vs LosslessCut
Learn how Kdenlive and LosslessCut differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Learn how Kdenlive and LosslessCut differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Kdenlive
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
kde/kdenlive
LosslessCut
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.69.0License
GPL-2.0Repository
mifi/lossless-cut
Detailed Comparison
Both Kdenlive and LosslessCut have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Kdenlive and LosslessCut have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
LosslessCut significantly outpaces Kdenlive in community adoption with 43,137 stars compared to 5,506 stars on GitHub. This 7.8x difference suggests LosslessCut has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LosslessCut has 2,128 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Kdenlive is growing faster, adding 157 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 795 stars for LosslessCut (+1.9%). Kdenlive is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Kdenlive last updated 6 hours ago and LosslessCut 3 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kdenlive uses Python, C, Objective-C, C++ while LosslessCut leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Project Maturity
Kdenlive has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to LosslessCut which began 10 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Kdenlive may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Kdenlive is licensed under GPL-3.0 while LosslessCut uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors. However, they also have distinct specializations: LosslessCut extends into Audio Editors.
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.