Learn how LosslessCut and Shotcut differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both LosslessCut and Shotcut have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LosslessCut leads in popularity with 43,039 stars vs 14,943 stars for Shotcut. The 188% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, LosslessCut has 2,124 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Shotcut is growing faster, adding 356 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 817 stars for LosslessCut (+1.9%). Shotcut is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with LosslessCut last updated 8 hours ago and Shotcut 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LosslessCut uses CSS, JSX, SCSS while Shotcut leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Shotcut has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to LosslessCut which began 10 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Shotcut may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Shotcut uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors. However, they also have distinct specializations: LosslessCut also focuses on Audio Editors.