LosslessCut vs Shotcut
Learn how LosslessCut and Shotcut differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Learn how LosslessCut and Shotcut differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
LosslessCut
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v3.69.0License
GPL-2.0Repository
mifi/lossless-cut
Shotcut
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
v26.8.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
mltframework/shotcut
Detailed Comparison
Both LosslessCut and Shotcut have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both LosslessCut and Shotcut have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
LosslessCut leads in popularity with 43,569 stars vs 15,109 stars for Shotcut. The 188% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, LosslessCut has 2,154 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
LosslessCut is growing faster, adding 803 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 224 stars for Shotcut (+1.5%). LosslessCut is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with LosslessCut last updated 13 hours ago and Shotcut 12 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LosslessCut uses CSS, JSX, SCSS while Shotcut leverages Python, C, Objective-C, C++.
Project Maturity
Shotcut has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to LosslessCut which began 10 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Shotcut may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: LosslessCut is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Shotcut uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors. However, they also have distinct specializations: LosslessCut also focuses on Audio Editors.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.