Ad
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.Learn More
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.Learn how Kdenlive and OpenShot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Both Kdenlive and OpenShot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kdenlive having 5,402 stars and OpenShot having 6,123 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenShot has 745 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kdenlive last updated 2 days ago and OpenShot 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kdenlive uses C, Objective-C, C++ while OpenShot leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kdenlive beginning 11 years ago and OpenShot 11 years ago.
Kdenlive is licensed under GPL-3.0, while OpenShot's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors.
Kdenlivevs
ShotcutActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository
Repository
