Learn how Kdenlive and OpenShot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Kdenlive and OpenShot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kdenlive having 5,506 stars and OpenShot having 6,190 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenShot has 758 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kdenlive is growing faster, adding 157 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 94 stars for OpenShot (+1.5%). Kdenlive is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kdenlive last updated 6 hours ago and OpenShot 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kdenlive uses C, Objective-C, C++ while OpenShot leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kdenlive beginning 11 years ago and OpenShot 11 years ago.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors.