Learn how Kdenlive and OpenShot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these video editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
GPL-3.0Repository
kde/kdenlive
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v4.0.1License
GPL-3.0Repository
openshot/openshot-qt
Both Kdenlive and OpenShot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kdenlive having 5,921 stars and OpenShot having 6,683 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, OpenShot has 828 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kdenlive is growing faster, adding 188 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 145 stars for OpenShot (+2.2%). Kdenlive is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kdenlive last updated 13 hours ago and OpenShot 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kdenlive uses C, Objective-C, C++ while OpenShot leverages CSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Kdenlive beginning 11 years ago and OpenShot 11 years ago.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Video Editors.