Learn how Hermes Agent and Suna differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Hermes Agent appears to have several advantages over Suna, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hermes Agent significantly outpaces Suna in community adoption with 233,469 stars compared to 20,124 stars on GitHub. This 11.6x difference suggests Hermes Agent has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hermes Agent has 46,751 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hermes Agent is growing faster, adding 15,183 stars in the last 30 days (+7%) against adding 114 stars for Suna (+0.6%). Hermes Agent is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hermes Agent last updated 9 hours ago and Suna 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hermes Agent uses Rust, Ruby, Tauri while Suna leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hermes Agent beginning 1 year ago and Suna 2 years ago.
Hermes Agent uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Suna's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hermes Agent also focuses on AI Personal Assistants.
Both Hermes Agent and Suna offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.