Learn how Hermes Agent and OpenWork differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Hermes Agent and OpenWork have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hermes Agent significantly outpaces OpenWork in community adoption with 236,799 stars compared to 23,081 stars on GitHub. This 10.3x difference suggests Hermes Agent has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hermes Agent has 47,873 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenWork is growing faster, adding 5,779 stars in the last 30 days (+33%) against adding 15,475 stars for Hermes Agent (+7%). OpenWork is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hermes Agent last updated 5 hours ago and OpenWork 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Rust, Tauri. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hermes Agent uses Python, Ruby while OpenWork leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hermes Agent beginning 1 year ago and OpenWork 7 months ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hermes Agent also focuses on AI Personal Assistants.
Both Hermes Agent and OpenWork offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.