Learn how Kortix and OpenWork differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.15.1License
Elastic-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kortix-ai/suna
Last 30 days

Both Kortix and OpenWork have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kortix having 20,543 stars and OpenWork having 24,438 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Kortix has 3,459 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenWork is growing faster, adding 461 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 282 stars for Kortix (+1.4%). OpenWork is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kortix last updated 8 hours ago and OpenWork 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kortix uses Python while OpenWork leverages Rust, Tauri.
Kortix has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to OpenWork which began 10 months ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Kortix may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenWork uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kortix's Elastic-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms.
Both Kortix and OpenWork offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.