Dub Links vs Shlink
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
27 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v5.1.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Detailed Comparison
Both Dub Links and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Dub Links and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces Shlink in community adoption with 24,645 stars compared to 5,254 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,266 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Dub Links is growing faster, adding 444 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 70 stars for Shlink (+1.4%). Dub Links is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 11 hours ago and Shlink 27 days ago.
Technology Stack
Dub Links uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Dub Links which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dub Links may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.