Dub Links vs Shlink
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v5.1.7License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Dub Links, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Dub Links, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces Shlink in community adoption with 24,793 stars compared to 5,297 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,297 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Dub Links and Shlink are moving at much the same rate, adding 240 stars and adding 64 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 11 hours ago and Shlink 14 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Dub Links uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Dub Links which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dub Links may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.