Dub Links vs Shlink
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Activity score
95/100Stars
24,142Forks
3,149Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
Shlink
Activity score
82/100Stars
5,173Forks
404Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v5.1.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Detailed Comparison
Both Dub Links and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Dub Links and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces Shlink in community adoption with 24,142 stars compared to 5,173 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,149 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Dub Links shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Shlink was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Dub Links is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Dub Links uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Dub Links which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dub Links may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.