Ad
 
Learn more

Dub Links vs Shlink

Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Dub Links

Dub Links

The link management platform for modern marketing teams to create marketing campaigns, link sharing features, and referral programs.
  • Stars


    23,581
  • Forks


    3,008
  • Last commit


    8 hours ago
  • Repository age


    4 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Dub Links
Favicon of Shlink

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.
  • Stars


    5,041
  • Forks


    390
  • Last commit


    1 day ago
  • Repository age


    10 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Shlink

Detailed Comparison

Shlink appears to have several advantages over Dub Links, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Dub Links wins
Community & Popularity

Dub Links significantly outpaces Shlink in community adoption with 23,581 stars compared to 5,041 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,008 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 8 hours ago and Shlink 1 day ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Dub Links uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.

Shlink wins
Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Dub Links which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Shlink wins
Licensing

Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.

Shlink wins
Hosting & Deployment

Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dub Links may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.