Dub Links vs Shlink
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.1.7License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Dub Links, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Dub Links, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces Shlink in community adoption with 24,875 stars compared to 5,334 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,321 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Shlink is growing faster, adding 54 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 139 stars for Dub Links (+0.6%). Shlink is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 6 hours ago and Shlink 21 days ago.
Technology Stack
Dub Links uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Dub Links which began 4 years ago. This 6.5-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Dub Links may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.