Ad
 
Learn more

Lua.sh vs Shlink

Learn how Lua.sh and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Lua.sh

Lua.sh

Open-source platform for creating shortened URLs with advanced analytics, custom domains, and API integration for marketing and development teams.
  • Stars


    331
  • Forks


    62
  • Last commit


    16 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Lua.sh
Favicon of Shlink

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.
  • Stars


    4,922
  • Forks


    385
  • Last commit


    7 days ago
  • Repository age


    10 years
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Shlink

Detailed Comparison

Shlink appears to have several advantages over Lua.sh, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Shlink wins
Community & Popularity

Shlink significantly outpaces Lua.sh in community adoption with 4,922 stars compared to 331 stars on GitHub. This 14.9x difference suggests Shlink has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 385 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Lua.sh last updated 16 days ago and Shlink 7 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lua.sh uses JavaScript, CSS, Vue, Laravel while Shlink leverages Bash.

Shlink wins
Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Lua.sh which began 2 years ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Shlink wins
Licensing

Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Lua.sh's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lua.sh also focuses on Web Analytics.

Shlink wins
Hosting & Deployment

Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Lua.sh may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.