What is the main difference between Lua.sh and Shlink?

Lua.sh and Shlink are both link management & shorteners but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Lua.sh or Shlink?

The choice between Lua.sh and Shlink depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Lua.sh to Shlink?

Migration between Lua.sh and Shlink is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.

Learn More

Lua.sh vs Shlink

Learn how Lua.sh and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

Lua.sh

Open-source platform for creating shortened URLs with advanced analytics, custom domains, and API integration for marketing and development teams.

Visit Lua.sh Read more

338stars+2(+0.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 months ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
1.0.5
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
luadotsh/lua

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.

Visit Shlink Read more

5,223stars+55(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
14 days ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v5.1.5
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
shlinkio/shlink

Sponsor Shlink ongithub.com

Detailed Comparison

Shlink appears to have several advantages over Lua.sh, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Shlink wins

Community & Popularity

Shlink significantly outpaces Lua.sh in community adoption with 5,223 stars compared to 338 stars on GitHub. This 15.5x difference suggests Shlink has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 409 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Shlink wins

Growth Momentum

Shlink is growing faster, adding 55 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 2 stars for Lua.sh (+0.6%). Shlink is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Shlink wins

Development Activity

Shlink shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 days ago, while Lua.sh was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Shlink is being more actively maintained.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lua.sh uses JavaScript, CSS, Vue, Laravel while Shlink leverages Bash.

Shlink wins

Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Lua.sh which began 2 years ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Shlink wins

Licensing

Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Lua.sh's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lua.sh also focuses on Web Analytics.

Comparable