Lua.sh vs Shlink
Learn how Lua.sh and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Lua.sh and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Lua.sh
Auto-fetched .
Shlink
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Lua.sh, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Lua.sh, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Shlink significantly outpaces Lua.sh in community adoption with 5,041 stars compared to 331 stars on GitHub. This 15.2x difference suggests Shlink has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 390 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Development Activity
Shlink shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Lua.sh was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Shlink is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Lua.sh uses JavaScript, CSS, Vue, Laravel while Shlink leverages Bash.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Lua.sh which began 2 years ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Lua.sh's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: Lua.sh also focuses on Web Analytics.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Lua.sh and Shlink offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.