Shlink vs Sink
Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.1.8License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Sink
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
ccbikai/sink
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in growth, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Shlink having 5,409 stars and Sink having 7,259 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 5,384 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Shlink is growing faster, adding 79 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 57 stars for Sink (+0.8%). Shlink is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 1 day ago and Sink 13 days ago.
Technology Stack
Shlink uses Bash, PHP while Sink leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Sink which began 3 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sink's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Sink may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.