Shlink vs Sink
Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v5.1.5License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
Sink
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.3.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
ccbikai/sink
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Shlink having 5,223 stars and Sink having 7,030 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 5,118 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Shlink and Sink are moving at much the same rate, adding 55 stars and adding 72 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 14 days ago and Sink 11 days ago.
Technology Stack
Shlink uses Bash, PHP while Sink leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sink which began 2 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sink's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Sink may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.