What is the main difference between Shlink and Sink?

Shlink and Sink are both link management & shorteners but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Shlink or Sink?

The choice between Shlink and Sink depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Shlink to Sink?

Migration between Shlink and Sink is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Shlink vs Sink

Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.

Visit Shlink Read more

Stars
4,922
Forks
385
Last commit
7 days ago
Repository age
10 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 1 hour ago.

Sink

A serverless link shortener that runs entirely on Cloudflare, offering URL compression, analytics, and customizable slugs.

Visit Sink Read more

Stars
6,549
Forks
4,473
Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
2 years
License
AGPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 1 hour ago.

Detailed Comparison

Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Shlink having 4,922 stars and Sink having 6,549 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 4,473 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 7 days ago and Sink 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Shlink uses Bash, PHP while Sink leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue, Nuxt.js.

Shlink wins

Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sink which began 2 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Shlink wins

Licensing

Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sink's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.

Shlink wins

Hosting & Deployment

Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Sink may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider