Learn how Shlink and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

Shlink appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Shlink having 5,209 stars and Sink having 7,012 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 5,078 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sink is growing faster, adding 92 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 54 stars for Shlink (+1%). Sink is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 8 days ago and Sink 5 days ago.
Shlink uses Bash, PHP while Sink leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue, Nuxt.js.
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Sink which began 2 years ago. This 8.2-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Shlink uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Sink's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Sink may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository