What is the main difference between Kutt and Shlink?

Kutt and Shlink are both link management & shorteners but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Kutt or Shlink?

The choice between Kutt and Shlink depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Kutt to Shlink?

Migration between Kutt and Shlink is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

Learn more

Kutt vs Shlink

Learn how Kutt and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

Kutt

Kutt offers a free and open-source solution for shortening URLs, complete with custom domains and detailed analytics.

Visit Kutt Read more

Activity score
88/100
Stars
10,985
Forks
1,482
Last commit
18 days ago
Repository age
8 years
Version
v3.2.6
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
thedevs-network/kutt

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.

Visit Shlink Read more

Activity score
82/100
Stars
5,176
Forks
403
Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v5.1.5
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
shlinkio/shlink

Detailed Comparison

Both Kutt and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Kutt wins

Community & Popularity

Kutt leads in popularity with 10,985 stars vs 5,176 stars for Shlink. The 112% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Kutt has 1,482 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kutt last updated 18 days ago and Shlink 1 month ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Kutt uses JavaScript while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.

Shlink wins

Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Kutt which began 8 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable