Learn how Kutt and Shlink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kutt and Shlink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kutt leads in popularity with 11,039 stars vs 5,223 stars for Shlink. The 111% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Kutt has 1,499 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Shlink is growing faster, adding 55 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 57 stars for Kutt (+0.5%). Shlink is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kutt last updated 3 days ago and Shlink 14 days ago.
Kutt uses JavaScript while Shlink leverages Bash, PHP.
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Kutt which began 9 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Both Kutt and Shlink offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.