Shlink vs WR.DO
Learn how Shlink and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Shlink and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Shlink
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v5.1.8License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
shlinkio/shlink
WR.DO
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.8License
MITRepository
oiov/wr.do
Detailed Comparison
Shlink appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Shlink appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Shlink leads in popularity with 5,409 stars vs 2,290 stars for WR.DO. The 136% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 448 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Shlink is growing faster, adding 79 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 5 stars for WR.DO (+0.2%). Shlink is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 1 day ago and WR.DO 11 days ago.
Technology Stack
Shlink uses Bash, PHP while WR.DO leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Project Maturity
Shlink has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to WR.DO which began 2 years ago. This 8.4-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.
Hosting & Deployment
Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WR.DO may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.