What is the main difference between Shlink and WR.DO?

Shlink and WR.DO are both link management & shorteners but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Shlink or WR.DO?

The choice between Shlink and WR.DO depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Shlink to WR.DO?

Migration between Shlink and WR.DO is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

Shlink vs WR.DO

Learn how Shlink and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.

Shlink

Keep control over all your shortened URLs by serving them under your own domains with this simple yet powerful tool.

Visit Shlink Read more

5,348stars+54(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
v5.1.7
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
shlinkio/shlink

WR.DO

WR.DO offers free domain name distribution and short URL generation, built on Cloudflare's infrastructure for reliability and speed.

Visit WR.DO Read more

2,288stars+10(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.1.8
License
MIT
Repository
oiov/wr.do

Detailed Comparison

Shlink appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Shlink wins

Community & Popularity

Shlink leads in popularity with 5,348 stars vs 2,288 stars for WR.DO. The 134% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Shlink has 429 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Shlink wins

Growth Momentum

Shlink is growing faster, adding 54 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 10 stars for WR.DO (+0.4%). Shlink is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Shlink last updated 3 days ago and WR.DO 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Shlink uses Bash, PHP while WR.DO leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

Shlink wins

Project Maturity

Shlink has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to WR.DO which began 2 years ago. This 8.4-year head start suggests Shlink may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.

Shlink wins

Hosting & Deployment

Shlink provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WR.DO may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider