Dub Links vs WR.DO
Learn how Dub Links and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
WR.DO
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.7License
MITRepository
oiov/wr.do
Detailed Comparison
Dub Links appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dub Links appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces WR.DO in community adoption with 24,793 stars compared to 2,278 stars on GitHub. This 10.9x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,297 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Dub Links is growing faster, adding 240 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against losing 2 stars for WR.DO (-0.1%). Dub Links is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 11 hours ago and WR.DO 10 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Project Maturity
Dub Links has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to WR.DO which began 2 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Dub Links may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
WR.DO uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: WR.DO extends into Networking & Connectivity.
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.