Dub Links vs WR.DO
Learn how Dub Links and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Learn how Dub Links and WR.DO differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Dub Links
Activity score
95/100Stars
24,142Forks
3,149Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
WR.DO
Activity score
76/100Stars
2,267Forks
367Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.1.7License
MITRepository
oiov/wr.do
Detailed Comparison
Dub Links appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dub Links appears to have several advantages over WR.DO, particularly in popularity, activity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Dub Links significantly outpaces WR.DO in community adoption with 24,142 stars compared to 2,267 stars on GitHub. This 10.6x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Dub Links has 3,149 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Dub Links shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while WR.DO was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Dub Links is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Project Maturity
Dub Links has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to WR.DO which began 2 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Dub Links may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
WR.DO uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Dub Links's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners. However, they also have distinct specializations: WR.DO extends into Networking & Connectivity.
Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.