Learn how Dub Links and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Dub Links and Sink have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dub Links significantly outpaces Sink in community adoption with 24,793 stars compared to 7,149 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 5,267 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Sink is growing faster, adding 107 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 240 stars for Dub Links (+1%). Sink is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 11 hours ago and Sink 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dub Links uses JSX, Next.js while Sink leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Dub Links has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Sink which began 2 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Dub Links may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.