Learn how Dub Links and Sink differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these link management & shorteners is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
4 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
dubinc/dub
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
ccbikai/sink
Dub Links appears to have several advantages over Sink, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Dub Links significantly outpaces Sink in community adoption with 25,084 stars compared to 7,249 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Dub Links has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Sink has 5,389 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dub Links and Sink are moving at much the same rate, adding 221 stars and adding 55 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.9% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dub Links last updated 7 days ago and Sink 7 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Dub Links uses JSX, Next.js while Sink leverages Vue, Nuxt.js.
Dub Links has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Sink which began 2 years ago. This 1.7-year head start suggests Dub Links may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Link Management & Shorteners.