Ad
 
Learn more

Automa vs Windmill

Learn how Automa and Windmill differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these workflow automation tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Automa

Automa

No-code platform for building AI agents and RPA workflows that automate repetitive business tasks across finance, HR, sales, and operations.
  • Stars


    21,411
  • Forks


    2,330
  • Last commit


    4 months ago
  • Repository age


    5 years
View Repository
Screenshot of Automa
Favicon of Windmill

Windmill

Powerful, self-hosted platform for building and running workflows, scripts, and apps with code-first approach and collaborative features.
  • Stars


    16,789
  • Forks


    996
  • Last commit


    6 hours ago
  • Repository age


    4 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of Windmill

Detailed Comparison

Windmill appears to have several advantages over Automa, particularly in activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Automa having 21,411 stars and Windmill having 16,789 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Automa has 2,330 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Windmill wins
Development Activity

Windmill shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Automa was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Windmill is being more actively maintained.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Automa uses Vue while Windmill leverages Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, SvelteKit.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Automa beginning 5 years ago and Windmill 4 years ago.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Workflow Automation. However, they also have distinct specializations: Automa also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, Browser Automation while Windmill extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools, Workflow Orchestration.

Windmill wins
Hosting & Deployment

Windmill provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Automa may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.