Learn how Atomic CRM and Odoo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these crm systems is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days

Both Atomic CRM and Odoo have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Odoo significantly outpaces Atomic CRM in community adoption with 53,801 stars compared to 1,201 stars on GitHub. This 44.8x difference suggests Odoo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Odoo has 33,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Atomic CRM is growing faster, adding 51 stars in the last 30 days (+4.4%) against adding 649 stars for Odoo (+1.2%). Atomic CRM is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Atomic CRM last updated 6 days ago and Odoo 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Atomic CRM uses Typescript, JSX while Odoo leverages CSS, Bash, Python.
Odoo has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Atomic CRM which began 2 years ago. This 10.2-year head start suggests Odoo may have more mature features and established processes.
Atomic CRM is licensed under MIT, while Odoo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in CRM Systems. However, they also have distinct specializations: Odoo extends into ERP Systems.
Odoo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Atomic CRM may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs