Agenta vs Latitude
Learn how Agenta and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Learn how Agenta and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm observability & evaluation is best for you.
Agenta
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.112.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
agenta-ai/agenta
Latitude
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
9.10.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
latitude-dev/latitude-llm
Detailed Comparison
Agenta appears to have several advantages over Latitude, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Agenta appears to have several advantages over Latitude, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both Agenta and Latitude show comparable community engagement with 4,495 and 4,595 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Agenta has 631 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Agenta is growing faster, adding 182 stars in the last 30 days (+4.2%) against adding 136 stars for Latitude (+3.1%). Agenta is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Agenta last updated 8 hours ago and Latitude 9 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Agenta uses Python, Next.js while Latitude leverages SvelteKit.
Project Maturity
Agenta has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Latitude which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Agenta may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Observability & Evaluation.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Agenta and Latitude offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.