Learn how Penpot and Tldraw differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these online design tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .


Penpot appears to have several advantages over Tldraw, particularly in maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Penpot and Tldraw show comparable community engagement with 45,401 and 46,386 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Tldraw has 3,146 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Penpot last updated 11 hours ago and Tldraw 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Penpot uses Python, SCSS, Rust, Java, Lua, Clojure while Tldraw leverages Next.js, Vue, GLSL.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Tldraw which began 5 years ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Tldraw's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Online Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Penpot also focuses on UI/UX Design while Tldraw extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Whiteboarding.
Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tldraw may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.