Learn how Graphite and Penpot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these online design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Penpot appears to have several advantages over Graphite, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Penpot leads in popularity with 59,763 stars vs 27,174 stars for Graphite. The 120% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 4,073 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Penpot is growing faster, adding 1,442 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 379 stars for Graphite (+1.4%). Penpot is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Graphite last updated 12 hours ago and Penpot 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Penpot leverages CSS, JSX, Python, Java, Lua, Clojure.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Graphite which began 6 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Graphite is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Penpot uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Online Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Graphite also focuses on Whiteboarding, Vector Graphics & Illustration while Penpot extends into UI/UX Design.
Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Graphite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.