Learn how Graphite and Penpot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Penpot appears to have several advantages over Graphite, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Penpot leads in popularity with 45,593 stars vs 25,185 stars for Graphite. The 81% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 2,714 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Graphite last updated 16 hours ago and Penpot 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, SCSS, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Penpot leverages CSS, JSX, Python, Java, Lua, Clojure.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Graphite which began 6 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Graphite is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Penpot uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Graphite also focuses on Design & Prototyping while Penpot extends into Online Design.
Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Graphite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.