Learn how Penpot and Quant-UX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
2.18.6License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
penpot/penpot
Last 30 days

Penpot appears to have several advantages over Quant-UX, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Penpot significantly outpaces Quant-UX in community adoption with 62,175 stars compared to 2,757 stars on GitHub. This 22.6x difference suggests Penpot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 4,384 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Penpot is growing faster, adding 1,322 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 28 stars for Quant-UX (+1%). Penpot is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Penpot last updated 9 hours ago and Quant-UX 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Penpot uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, Java, Lua, Clojure while Quant-UX leverages Vue.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Quant-UX which began 8 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Quant-UX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Penpot also focuses on Online Design.
Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quant-UX may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.