Learn how Penpot and Quant-UX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Penpot appears to have several advantages over Quant-UX, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Penpot significantly outpaces Quant-UX in community adoption with 45,593 stars compared to 2,506 stars on GitHub. This 18.2x difference suggests Penpot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 2,714 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Penpot last updated 3 hours ago and Quant-UX 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Penpot uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, Java, Lua, Clojure while Quant-UX leverages Vue.
Penpot has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Quant-UX which began 7 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Quant-UX uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Penpot also focuses on Online Design while Quant-UX extends into Testing & Quality Assurance.
Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Quant-UX may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.