What is the main difference between OpenPencil and Penpot?

OpenPencil and Penpot are both ui/ux design tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: OpenPencil or Penpot?

The choice between OpenPencil and Penpot depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from OpenPencil to Penpot?

Migration between OpenPencil and Penpot is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

OpenPencil vs Penpot

Learn how OpenPencil and Penpot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.

OpenPencil

A Figma-compatible design editor with built-in AI chat, headless CLI, real-time P2P collaboration, and a Vue SDK for building custom editors. No account needed.

Visit OpenPencil Read more

9,112stars+733(+8.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
8 months
Version
v0.16.0
License
MIT
Repository
open-pencil

Penpot

Design, prototype, and hand off to developers in one platform. Supports design systems, tokens, flexible layouts, and AI workflows with real CSS/HTML output.

Visit Penpot Read more

61,351stars+1,183(+2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
2.18.3
License
MPL-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
penpot/penpot

Detailed Comparison

Both OpenPencil and Penpot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Penpot wins

Community & Popularity

Penpot significantly outpaces OpenPencil in community adoption with 61,351 stars compared to 9,112 stars on GitHub. This 6.7x difference suggests Penpot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Penpot has 4,252 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

OpenPencil wins

Growth Momentum

OpenPencil is growing faster, adding 733 stars in the last 30 days (+8.7%) against adding 1,183 stars for Penpot (+2%). OpenPencil is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with OpenPencil last updated 13 hours ago and Penpot 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenPencil uses Vue, Tauri while Penpot leverages Bash, JSX, Python, SCSS, Java, Lua, Clojure.

Penpot wins

Project Maturity

Penpot has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to OpenPencil which began 8 months ago. This 10.3-year head start suggests Penpot may have more mature features and established processes.

OpenPencil wins

Licensing

OpenPencil uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Penpot's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design. However, they also have distinct specializations: Penpot extends into Online Design.

Penpot wins

Hosting & Deployment

Penpot provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while OpenPencil may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider