Learn how OpenPencil and Quant-UX differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ui/ux design tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

OpenPencil appears to have several advantages over Quant-UX, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenPencil significantly outpaces Quant-UX in community adoption with 8,661 stars compared to 2,725 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests OpenPencil has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenPencil has 856 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
OpenPencil is growing faster, adding 593 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 31 stars for Quant-UX (+1.2%). OpenPencil is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenPencil last updated 14 hours ago and Quant-UX 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenPencil uses Typescript, Rust, Tauri while Quant-UX leverages SCSS.
Quant-UX has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to OpenPencil which began 7 months ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Quant-UX may have more mature features and established processes.
OpenPencil uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Quant-UX's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in UI/UX Design.