Learn how OpenCode and Plandex differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai coding agents is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

OpenCode appears to have several advantages over Plandex, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenCode significantly outpaces Plandex in community adoption with 200,594 stars compared to 15,593 stars on GitHub. This 12.9x difference suggests OpenCode has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenCode has 25,929 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
OpenCode is growing faster, adding 11,264 stars in the last 30 days (+5.9%) against adding 12 stars for Plandex (+0.1%). OpenCode is both larger and pulling further ahead.
OpenCode shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Plandex was last updated 11 months ago. This suggests OpenCode is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenCode uses JSX, Rust, Tauri while Plandex leverages Bash, Golang, C, Objective-C.
Plandex has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to OpenCode which began 1 year ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests Plandex may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Coding Agents.