Ad
 
Learn more

iTerm 2 vs Ray.so

Learn how iTerm 2 and Ray.so differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of iTerm 2

iTerm 2

Feature-rich terminal replacement for macOS with split panes, search, autocomplete, and extensive customization options for enhanced productivity.
  • Stars


    17,598
  • Forks


    1,385
  • Last commit


    17 hours ago
  • Repository age


    15 years
  • License


    GPL-2.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of iTerm 2
Favicon of Ray.so

Ray.so

Turn your code into beautiful images. Choose from a range of syntax colors, hide or show the background, and toggle between a dark and light window.
  • Stars


    2,289
  • Forks


    338
  • Last commit


    13 days ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Ray.so

Detailed Comparison

Both iTerm 2 and Ray.so have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

iTerm 2 wins
Community & Popularity

iTerm 2 significantly outpaces Ray.so in community adoption with 17,598 stars compared to 2,289 stars on GitHub. This 7.7x difference suggests iTerm 2 has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, iTerm 2 has 1,385 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with iTerm 2 last updated 17 hours ago and Ray.so 13 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: iTerm 2 uses Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, Ruby, C++, Swift, MATLAB while Ray.so leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

iTerm 2 wins
Project Maturity

iTerm 2 has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Ray.so which began 3 years ago. This 11.8-year head start suggests iTerm 2 may have more mature features and established processes.

Ray.so wins
Licensing

Ray.so uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than iTerm 2's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

iTerm 2 also focuses on Terminal Emulators while Ray.so extends into Code Snippet Stylers.