Learn how GIMP and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both GIMP and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
GIMP leads in popularity with 6,456 stars vs 4,186 stars for RawTherapee. The 54% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, GIMP has 896 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
GIMP and RawTherapee are moving at much the same rate, adding 72 stars and adding 39 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.1% vs +0.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with GIMP last updated 7 hours ago and RawTherapee 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GIMP uses JavaScript, Lua while RawTherapee leverages C#.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to RawTherapee which began 11 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
RawTherapee is licensed under GPL-3.0, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.