Learn how Darktable and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Darktable and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Darktable significantly outpaces RawTherapee in community adoption with 13,061 stars compared to 4,169 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Darktable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Darktable has 1,425 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
RawTherapee is growing faster, adding 60 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 127 stars for Darktable (+1%). RawTherapee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darktable last updated 11 hours ago and RawTherapee 16 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Darktable uses JavaScript, Ruby, Lua while RawTherapee leverages C#.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to RawTherapee which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.