Learn how Darktable and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Darktable appears to have several advantages over RawTherapee, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Darktable significantly outpaces RawTherapee in community adoption with 13,184 stars compared to 4,196 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Darktable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Darktable has 1,451 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Darktable and RawTherapee are moving at much the same rate, adding 166 stars and adding 44 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.3% vs +1.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darktable last updated 7 hours ago and RawTherapee 19 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Darktable uses JavaScript, Ruby, Lua while RawTherapee leverages C#.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to RawTherapee which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.