Ad
Learn more

Compositor vs Darktable

Learn how Compositor and Darktable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.

vs

Compositor

Mac-native Photoshop alternative built around compositing and post-processing workflows, with layers, masks, blend modes, filters, and background removal.
18,450stars+9,475(+106%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    15 hours ago
  • Repository age

    2 months
  • Version

    v1.6.4
  • License

    MIT
  • Repository

    compositor
Screenshot of Compositor

Darktable

Open source photography workflow application for RAW development. Non-destructive editing, professional color management, and GPU acceleration for photographers.
13,399stars+192(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    15 hours ago
  • Repository age

    15 years
  • Version

    5.6.2
  • License

    GPL-3.0
  • Repository

    darktable
Screenshot of Darktable

Detailed Comparison

Both Compositor and Darktable have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable
Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Compositor having 18,450 stars and Darktable having 13,399 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Compositor has 1,831 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Compositor wins
Growth Momentum

Compositor is growing faster, adding 9,475 stars in the last 30 days (+106%) against adding 192 stars for Darktable (+1.5%). Compositor is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 15 hours ago and Darktable 15 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Compositor uses Swift while Darktable leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C++, Ruby, Perl, Lua.

Darktable wins
Project Maturity

Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 2 months ago. This 14.7-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.

Compositor wins
Licensing

Compositor uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Darktable's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.