Learn how Compositor and Darktable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v1.6.4License
MITRepository
compositor
Last 30 days

Both Compositor and Darktable have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Compositor having 18,450 stars and Darktable having 13,399 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Compositor has 1,831 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Compositor is growing faster, adding 9,475 stars in the last 30 days (+106%) against adding 192 stars for Darktable (+1.5%). Compositor is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 15 hours ago and Darktable 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Compositor uses Swift while Darktable leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C++, Ruby, Perl, Lua.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 2 months ago. This 14.7-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
Compositor uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Darktable's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.