Learn how Darktable and RAWmakase differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Darktable and RAWmakase have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Darktable significantly outpaces RAWmakase in community adoption with 13,213 stars compared to 245 stars on GitHub. This 53.9x difference suggests Darktable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Darktable has 1,453 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Darktable and RAWmakase are moving at much the same rate, adding 184 stars and adding 4 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.7%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darktable last updated 4 hours ago and RAWmakase 3 hours ago.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to RAWmakase which began 11 days ago. This 14.7-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
RAWmakase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Darktable's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.