Learn how RAWmakase and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Stars
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both RAWmakase and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
RawTherapee significantly outpaces RAWmakase in community adoption with 4,211 stars compared to 245 stars on GitHub. This 17.2x difference suggests RawTherapee has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, RawTherapee has 421 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
RAWmakase is growing faster, adding 4 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 52 stars for RawTherapee (+1.3%). RAWmakase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with RAWmakase last updated 3 hours ago and RawTherapee 4 hours ago.
RawTherapee has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to RAWmakase which began 11 days ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests RawTherapee may have more mature features and established processes.
RAWmakase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than RawTherapee's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.