What is the main difference between RAWmakase and RawTherapee?

RAWmakase and RawTherapee are both photo editing software but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: RAWmakase or RawTherapee?

The choice between RAWmakase and RawTherapee depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from RAWmakase to RawTherapee?

Migration between RAWmakase and RawTherapee is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn more

RAWmakase vs RawTherapee

Learn how RAWmakase and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.

RAWmakase

Non-destructive RAW photo editor for macOS, Linux, and Windows that reads Lightroom catalogs, presets, and camera profiles. Free, MIT licensed, built in Rust.

Visit RAWmakase Read more

1,550stars+1,309(+543%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
1 month
Version
v0.4.6
License
MIT
Repository
pch/rawmakase

RawTherapee

Free, cross-platform raw image processor with 32-bit floating point engine, advanced demosaicing algorithms, and professional-grade editing tools for photographers.

Visit RawTherapee Read more

4,253stars+68(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 days ago
Repository age
11 years
Version
5.13
License
GPL-3.0
Repository
rawtherapee

Detailed Comparison

Both RAWmakase and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

RawTherapee wins

Community & Popularity

RawTherapee leads in popularity with 4,253 stars vs 1,550 stars for RAWmakase. The 174% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, RawTherapee has 426 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

RAWmakase wins

Growth Momentum

RAWmakase is growing faster, adding 1,309 stars in the last 30 days (+543%) against adding 68 stars for RawTherapee (+1.6%). RAWmakase is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with RAWmakase last updated 10 hours ago and RawTherapee 7 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS, Bash, Python, C++. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: RAWmakase uses Typescript, Rust, Ruby while RawTherapee leverages C, Objective-C, C#, Perl.

RawTherapee wins

Project Maturity

RawTherapee has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to RAWmakase which began 1 month ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests RawTherapee may have more mature features and established processes.

RAWmakase wins

Licensing

RAWmakase uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than RawTherapee's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.

Other tool comparisons to consider