Learn how Darktable and Krita differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days

Both Darktable and Krita have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Darktable having 13,132 stars and Krita having 10,425 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Darktable has 1,444 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Krita is growing faster, adding 157 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 141 stars for Darktable (+1.1%). Krita is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Darktable last updated 15 hours ago and Krita 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Darktable uses CSS, Ruby, Lua while Krita leverages Java, Swift, MATLAB.
Darktable has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Krita which began 11 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Darktable may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the GPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.