Learn how GIMP and Krita differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Last 30 days

Krita appears to have several advantages over GIMP, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Krita leads in popularity with 10,237 stars vs 6,369 stars for GIMP. The 61% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, GIMP has 886 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Krita is growing faster, adding 164 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 86 stars for GIMP (+1.4%). Krita is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with GIMP last updated 7 hours ago and Krita 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GIMP uses CSS, Lua while Krita leverages Java, Swift, MATLAB.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Krita which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
Krita is licensed under GPL-3.0, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.