Learn how GIMP and Krita differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these design & prototyping tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both GIMP and Krita have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Krita leads in popularity with 9,903 stars vs 6,218 stars for GIMP. The 59% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, GIMP has 876 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with GIMP last updated 11 hours ago and Krita 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Perl. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GIMP uses CSS, Lua while Krita leverages Java, Swift, MATLAB.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Krita which began 11 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
Krita is licensed under GPL-3.0, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Design & Prototyping.