Learn how Compositor and GIMP differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
2 monthsVersion
v1.6.4License
MITRepository
compositor
Last 30 days
Last commit
17 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsRepository
gnome/gimp
Compositor appears to have several advantages over GIMP, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Compositor leads in popularity with 18,450 stars vs 6,565 stars for GIMP. The 181% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Compositor has 1,831 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Compositor is growing faster, adding 9,475 stars in the last 30 days (+106%) against adding 85 stars for GIMP (+1.3%). Compositor is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 15 hours ago and GIMP 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Compositor uses Swift while GIMP leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C++, Perl, Lua.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 2 months ago. This 14.5-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
Compositor is licensed under MIT, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.