Learn how Compositor and GIMP differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Both Compositor and GIMP have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Compositor having 5,572 stars and GIMP having 6,448 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, GIMP has 894 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Compositor is growing faster, adding 5,238 stars in the last 30 days (+1,568%) against adding 71 stars for GIMP (+1.1%). Compositor is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 11 hours ago and GIMP 18 hours ago.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 9 days ago. This 14.5-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
Compositor is licensed under MIT, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.