Learn how Compositor and GIMP differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Repository

Compositor appears to have several advantages over GIMP, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Compositor leads in popularity with 17,125 stars vs 6,517 stars for GIMP. The 163% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Compositor has 1,676 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Compositor is growing faster, adding 16,791 stars in the last 30 days (+5,027%) against adding 88 stars for GIMP (+1.4%). Compositor is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 2 days ago and GIMP 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Compositor uses Swift while GIMP leverages JavaScript, CSS, Python, C++, Perl, Lua.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 30 days ago. This 14.5-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
Compositor is licensed under MIT, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.