Learn how GIMP and PixiEditor differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsRepository
gnome/gimp
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
2.1.2.5License
LGPL-3.0Repository
pixieditor
Both GIMP and PixiEditor have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with GIMP having 6,589 stars and PixiEditor having 8,147 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, GIMP has 928 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
GIMP is growing faster, adding 72 stars in the last 30 days (+1.1%) against adding 45 stars for PixiEditor (+0.6%). GIMP is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with GIMP last updated 4 hours ago and PixiEditor 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: GIMP uses Objective-C, C++, Perl, Lua while PixiEditor leverages C#.
GIMP has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to PixiEditor which began 8 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests GIMP may have more mature features and established processes.
PixiEditor is licensed under LGPL-3.0, while GIMP's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.