Learn how Compositor and RawTherapee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these photo editing software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Compositor and RawTherapee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Compositor having 5,572 stars and RawTherapee having 4,182 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Compositor has 597 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Compositor is growing faster, adding 5,238 stars in the last 30 days (+1,568%) against adding 48 stars for RawTherapee (+1.2%). Compositor is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Compositor last updated 11 hours ago and RawTherapee 5 days ago.
RawTherapee has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Compositor which began 9 days ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests RawTherapee may have more mature features and established processes.
Compositor uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than RawTherapee's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Photo Editors.