Learn how Ghostty and Ray.so differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Ghostty and Ray.so have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ghostty significantly outpaces Ray.so in community adoption with 55,272 stars compared to 2,289 stars on GitHub. This 24.1x difference suggests Ghostty has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ghostty has 2,777 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ghostty last updated 20 hours ago and Ray.so 12 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ghostty uses Bash, Python, C, Objective-C, C++, Swift, MATLAB, GLSL, Zig while Ray.so leverages JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ghostty beginning 4 years ago and Ray.so 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Ghostty also focuses on Terminal Emulators while Ray.so extends into Code Snippet Stylers.