Learn how Forgejo and Gogs differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days

Both Forgejo and Gogs have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gogs significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 47,886 stars compared to 5,673 stars on GitHub. This 8.4x difference suggests Gogs has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gogs has 5,079 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Forgejo is growing faster, adding 162 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 69 stars for Gogs (+0.1%). Forgejo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Forgejo shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Gogs was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Forgejo is being more actively maintained.
Gogs has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Gogs may have more mature features and established processes.
Gogs is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms.
Both Forgejo and Gogs offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.