Learn how Forgejo and Gogs differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Gogs appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Gogs significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 47,506 stars compared to 4,107 stars on GitHub. This 11.6x difference suggests Gogs has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Gogs has 5,042 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 9 hours ago and Gogs 1 day ago.
Gogs has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 3 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Gogs may have more mature features and established processes.
Gogs is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Forgejo also focuses on Version Control & Collaboration.
Both Forgejo and Gogs offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.