Ad
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn More
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn how Forgejo and GitLab differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
GitLab appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity and features when making your decision.
GitLab significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 24,513 stars compared to 5,217 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests GitLab has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, GitLab has 5,919 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 9 hours ago and GitLab 11 hours ago.
GitLab has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests GitLab may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Forgejo also focuses on Version Control & Collaboration while GitLab extends into Project Management Suites, CI/CD Platforms.
Both Forgejo and GitLab offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
GitLabvs
GiteaActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository
Repository
