Learn how Forgejo and GitLab differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these git platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

GitLab appears to have several advantages over Forgejo, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
GitLab significantly outpaces Forgejo in community adoption with 24,532 stars compared to 5,331 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests GitLab has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, GitLab has 5,985 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Forgejo is growing faster, adding 180 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 30 stars for GitLab (+0.1%). Forgejo is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Forgejo last updated 9 hours ago and GitLab 8 hours ago.
GitLab has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Forgejo which began 4 years ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests GitLab may have more mature features and established processes.
GitLab is licensed under MIT, while Forgejo's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Git Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Forgejo also focuses on Version Control & Collaboration while GitLab extends into Project Management Suites, CI/CD Platforms.
Both Forgejo and GitLab offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.