Ad
 
Learn more

GitLab vs Woodpecker CI

Learn how GitLab and Woodpecker CI differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ci/cd platforms is best for you.

vs
Favicon of GitLab

GitLab

A comprehensive AI-powered DevSecOps platform that integrates development, security, and operations, streamlining software delivery and enhancing productivity.
  • Stars


    24,340
  • Forks


    5,797
  • Last commit


    11 hours ago
  • Repository age


    15 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of GitLab
Favicon of Woodpecker CI

Woodpecker CI

Open-source CI/CD platform using Docker containers for pipeline execution. Create multiple workflows, extend with plugins, and enjoy free lifetime access.
  • Stars


    7,087
  • Forks


    566
  • Last commit


    18 hours ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
  • License


    Apache-2.0
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Woodpecker CI

Detailed Comparison

GitLab appears to have several advantages over Woodpecker CI, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

GitLab wins
Community & Popularity

GitLab significantly outpaces Woodpecker CI in community adoption with 24,340 stars compared to 7,087 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests GitLab has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, GitLab has 5,797 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with GitLab last updated 11 hours ago and Woodpecker CI 18 hours ago.

GitLab wins
Project Maturity

GitLab has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Woodpecker CI which began 7 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests GitLab may have more mature features and established processes.

Woodpecker CI wins
Licensing

Woodpecker CI is licensed under Apache-2.0, while GitLab's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in CI/CD Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: GitLab also focuses on Project Management Suites, Git Platforms.

GitLab wins
Hosting & Deployment

GitLab provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Woodpecker CI may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.